On the Bad Nature of Women (Urban Life Adult Novel)

This is an era where even a dog has the opportunity to fuck a beautiful woman!

————Introduction

Preface: I have always wanted to make a rational and focused study of my understanding and feelings about women over the years. During this period of transition, I feel that our Eastern culture has never fully understood women!

I think, as far as I am concerned, I should now be qualified to organize and comment on the bad qualities of women! In my relatively short life experience, I have met many women. I have enjoyed the most beautiful side of women (before I was eleven years old, I snuggled in the arms of my biological mother, bathing in the purest, warmest maternal love in the world), but since I was eleven years old, I began to bear the impact of the ugly and bad nature of women that surged like a tide! But the warmth that maternal love gave me still could not free me from the psychological inertia of women's virtues. It was not until I was 22 years old that I began to truly and objectively face the inferior nature of women in my own life consciousness.

In countless lonely and depressing nights, if we think carefully, we will find that those who actually cause serious trauma to our spirit are almost all women!

As I grew up, in my romantic interactions with women, I began to consciously explore and analyze the origins of women’s hearts and minds. I searched and dug into Fake's companions in many aspects and fields. My purpose was not entirely out of lust. To a large extent, I was also looking for arguments to overturn my conclusion that women are evil. However, unfortunately, whether it is among compatriot women, Japanese women, Korean women, Russian women, Mongolian women, Thai women, or New Zealand women, I have not been able to find even one argument that can help me get out of the psychological shadow of not being able to compliment women!

I am very disappointed and even a little desperate! However, life must go on, and I still cannot escape the fate of having to marry a woman with bad qualities and have children with her in the future. Therefore, my motivation for writing this article is not to deny women, nor do I want to affect the eating, drinking, defecating and urinating of netizens who have read this article. Its purpose is just to provide everyone with an alternative way of thinking, a new way of thinking about women. My greatest hope is that after reading my article, people will stop hating and resentful about certain vulgar behaviors of women, and understand and comprehend women from a rational perspective. I just hope that women will no longer be so incredible from now on!

In addition, humans have been running around to this day and have summarized tens of millions of laws governing the operation of the world, but there is no law in the world that can fully and thoroughly explain the carrier or attribute to which it is attached. In other words, my research and conclusions on women here cannot be applied to all women. In fact, perhaps, in the corners that I have not been able to explore, our society still has three or two excellent women with beautiful hearts lurking. Of course, the object of my analysis does not include this one ten-millionth.

Here, I would like to clarify my personal issues regarding love. In fact, the reason why Chang was willing to elaborate on the bad nature of women, especially his fellow women, from a rational perspective was because women's attitude towards him had changed from rude to respectful in recent years. The strength of this arrogance at first and respectfulness later can surpass any male villain in life! Yes, I have experienced extreme poverty. When I was a down-and-out young man, the women around me would not even give me a glimmer of hope! When I was in college, I often watched Stephen Chow's movies with tears in my eyes. The down-and-out little man in the movie was desperately trying to find his love in this sad world (representative works: Flirting Scholar, King of Destruction, King of Comedy, etc.), and I felt a strong resonance in my heart. In fact, Xing Ge’s films are quite accurate in their deconstruction of love to a large extent. Especially the King of Destruction, who was ultimately a poor and incompetent little man who won the fight and gained wealth only through some utopian fantasy and then won the woman's heart; in Flirting Scholar, when Qiuxiang did not know that the servant pursuing her was the famous Jiangnan talent Tang Bohu, the scene of the cruel rejection of Hua An's courtship made me sigh! The reason why Tang Bohu finally won Qiuxiang's heart was not by showing off his talents, but by making his identity clear. So Qiuxiang immediately ran into Tang's arms. Ironically, at the end of the movie, Qiuxiang was included in the same vulgar setting as Tang Bohu's previous wives. This was really a stroke of genius by the director. In terms of irony of reality, it was so accurate and thorough!

Similarly, a similar plot entered Chang's life without any unusualness. When Chang was down and out and penniless a few years ago, he felt that pursuing a relatively beautiful woman was so, so, so, so, so difficult! When a woman rejects you, she can come up with a thousand reasons, and the most surprising thing is that none of these reasons has anything to do with your "lack of money". Fortunately, God has been merciful. In the past few years, Chang has achieved some success. Oh my god, those extremely beautiful women who Chang thought he would never get in his lifetime three or four years ago, suddenly appeared around him magically and were almost within his reach! What is equally amazing is that when those women implicitly and shyly told me why they liked my beautiful heart, they had more than a thousand reasons, and none of these reasons had anything to do with my wealth. So, all the reasons that the woman originally listed as reasons for rejecting me suddenly and magically became Chang Mou's attractions. For example, the woman originally disliked my concern for the world and thought I was boring and crazy, but now, it has become a manifestation of my lofty ambitions; she originally disliked Chang's extreme personality, but now it has become a symbol of his personality; she originally disliked Chang's rude temperament, but now it has become evidence to prove that he is masculine. . . . . . This extremely inconsistent standard of judgment, alas, has caused serious confusion in Chang's life orientation.

In fact, the reason why China is so cumbersome is not just a problem at the institutional level! If we carefully observe the role of women in the functioning of the country, society, family, and the relationship between men and women, we will find that women are actually playing an extremely corrosive role!

The prosperity of a country depends on the improvement of its system and the advancement of its culture. As men, we should be vigilant and self-respecting, and work hard to become stronger. However, as women, we also need to keep up with the times, get rid of our many bad qualities, and work together with men to build and improve this country!

So I thought that no matter what, I should investigate the woman carefully!

Article Sections

1. Why are women so vulgar?

1. The vulgarity derived from women’s primitive instincts

2. The bad qualities brought about by women’s innate monogamy

3. The pursuit of a sense of security: the psychological starting point for women to become vulgar

1. Why are women so vulgar?

1. The vulgarity derived from women’s primitive instincts

In primitive society, the human world had already developed a preliminary division of labor due to gender differences. At that time, males were responsible for hunting outside, while females stayed in small caves, taking care of weak children and managing the household.

From this time on, men and women began to enter two completely different worlds! When a man walks into the vast nature, his psychological space is so huge. This psychological world has continued to this day and is the topic of discussion among men. It is always broad and covers a very deep and wide range of topics. However, a woman’s world is only as big as a cave, so their psychological world is still so small until now. Their vision can never go beyond a small space, and as for the world outside that space, even if it blows their minds away, they are still ignorant and ignorant, and therefore have no interest in it.

Here, the following problem arises: the world of men is very large, and they have many opportunities for contact, selection, collision, communication, and progress, while the world of women is too small, so small that there is hardly any room for adjustment or betrayal. Therefore, women's vision is always so short-sighted! We see that most women around us make choices by looking at their toes.

In fact, the initial division of labor in role-playing between men and women due to gender differences has had a profound, even fundamental impact on the development and performance of men and women in the civilized era. It directly determines the gap between men and women in all aspects such as psychology, life orientation, quality, etc.

When we understand the life style of women who originally lived in caves, it is easy for us to understand why women’s vision is still so narrow now.

(1) Women are extremely curious and like to fantasize. Because their space is fixed inside the cave, and they know about the wonderful world outside through the descriptions given by men when they return from hunting, they know about the existence of nature and the world, but they cannot go out (because there are wild beasts outside the door, the men told them). Therefore, women's curiosity is constrained by their abilities, so they can only imagine and process their understanding and yearning for the outside world through men's language. The fatal thing is that although it would be fine if it were just pure fantasy, women often rationally separate reality from fantasy, and they often use fantasy situations as the standard for their choices.

(2) Women are very easy to be deceived. Because women's genes lack fundamental understanding of the outside world, their small space makes it difficult for them to appreciate the complexity and wonder of the world. They are unable to form correct standards for understanding and evaluating the truth, and have no way of making the right choices. Even if some standards have been formed (mainly through the teachings of parents and partial indoctrination by men returning from outside), they are very simple and fragile. This characteristic can explain why many women are seduced by pig-headed men when they are young. Because the pig-headed man is intentionally or unintentionally hitting the characteristics of women's "love of fantasy" and "incomplete standards". For example, when a woman realizes the importance of wealth, she will only use wealth as the criterion for making choices. At this time, the pig-headed man can easily win the woman's heart by simply pretending to have huge wealth now or in the future. When a woman realizes the importance of a man's loyalty in this complex world, and simply has the illusion that an ugly man will inevitably be emotionally loyal in real life, she will simply use ugliness as the criterion for making choices. etc.

(3) The narrow space leads to the most serious bad habits among women, which is that it cuts off their attention and concern for the outside world! In a woman's mind, life consists only of herself and her family. Apart from this, everything else in the world has nothing to do with you. So we painfully discover that women are so indifferent in the face of the social environment, and they rarely show heartfelt love to children other than their own flesh and blood! This can explain why most stepmothers in the world are so unloving towards their stepchildren. In fact, it is unlikely that any stepmother in the world would truly devote her heart and soul to caring for her stepchildren beyond the secular show. Women often appear extremely numb to the ruthlessness and coldness of the world, and simply play the role of the source of the world's cruelty.

This point will be further elaborated upon when I discuss the corrosive effects and obstacles women pose to social development.

2. The bad qualities brought about by women’s innate monogamy

The Australian Centre for Sexology Research once conducted such an experiment. They found several cows, sheep, deer, pigs, dogs and other animals and let them mate. They found that after a male animal has made love with a female animal for more than five times, it will no longer be interested in continuing to have sex with the same female sexual partner, even if the female animal is sprayed with aphrodisiac perfume or a flower is inserted on its head. At this time, as long as a female animal comes to have sex with the male animal, the male animal will quickly get rid of his previous fatigue and engage in the battle with full energy.

Female animals, however, do not seem to have this phenomenon in general. They can generally accept having continuous sex with the same male sexual partner with peace of mind and will not get tired of it no matter how many times they do it.

If we use the modern civilized standards of monogamy to judge this difference between males and females, humans may admire the loyalty of female animals. However, if we explain this issue from the perspective of the evolutionary order of mankind, this phenomenon cannot be regarded as an argument for the nobility and excellence of women, but rather reflects some inferior qualities of women.

From a natural biological perspective, a woman's loyalty to a man does not stem from the depth of her feelings for him, but rather from her animal instinct. So from this point, we can first overturn the lies that women often tell about loyalty and loving only you. In fact, even when a woman is with a man she doesn't love, she will not be tired of the constant quarrel with him.

On the surface, women's sexual exclusivity is in line with the aesthetics of modern civilization, but from the perspective of Darwin's natural law of survival of the fittest, this is an obstacle to human self-evolution! The reason why men look for different partners in many ways is that they are always instinctively driven to pursue the optimal reproduction. That is, men have been fighting with nature and others outside. They deeply know the importance of being strong and capable, which is the key to their survival, their responsibilities, and the successful performance of their social roles. They know that in order to effectively extend their lives, they must reproduce an offspring who is as strong as themselves or even more capable than themselves, and a purebred offspring. But deep down, women never have this awareness. They rarely come into contact with cruel and bloody competition, lack a thorough understanding of the survival of the fittest, and have no attachment to pure breeds. In their minds, the existence of life only concerns themselves and has little to do with future generations.

The manifestation of this characteristic in reality is that when a woman chooses a mate, she will not consider the man's instinctive conditions. A beautiful and high-quality woman will willingly snuggle in the arms of a mean and old man without feeling the slightest bit of uneasiness, and she will also willingly reproduce an inferior offspring with him. The woman will not care whether the man belongs to the motherland or not. In the woman's mind, there are only men in the world, and there is no race, nationality or country. Really, women are instinctively very indifferent to the concept of the country!

3. The pursuit of a sense of security: the psychological starting point for women to become vulgar

This is an issue I want to focus on. The various misunderstandings and gaps between men and women today are largely due to men's lack of necessary understanding of women's nature and its derivative behaviors.

As mentioned above, from primitive society to the present day, women are generally responsible for taking care of the household. In other words, her survival and development often depend on the gains of men from hunting outside. The woman has great patience, which was developed from thousands of years of waiting at home for the man's triumphant return. In fact, men also pursue a sense of security, but they have historically, or in other words, completely tied the channel for obtaining a sense of security to themselves. Since they can only rely on themselves and are confident that they can achieve a sense of security, a sense of security is no big deal for men. But it is different for women, because no matter from which angle, women are inherently lacking in the confidence to achieve a sense of security. Thousands of years of psychological continuity have made it impossible for women to get rid of the psychological inertia of having to find a "macho man" to rely on even when society has entered an era of universal welfare!

Let us analyze the composition of the so-called "sense of security" - in fact, the word "sense of security" can also be replaced by "interests" or "needs". The preliminary summary should include the following points:

(1) A sense of security for survival and development. This includes the need to have enough food and clothing to continue to survive; further, the need to improve the living environment by eating well, dressing well and living well, and the need to keep up with the times, that is, the need to keep up with or lead the trend, etc.

(2) Comfort and spiritual security. It includes the need to exclusively possess her partner and the need to satisfy her vanity in front of the same sex: this also includes the vanity satisfaction brought to her by her partner's image, the abundant material life, noble social status and superior life taste that her partner can give her, etc.

In short, the content of this "sense of security" is rich and has a natural hierarchy. That is, women tend to pursue a sense of security in survival and development first, and then a sense of security in spiritual comfort. This explains why in real life, many women would ignore the fact that a rich and successful man already has many women, and still rush into his arms and be willing to become one of his many women. Because she must first get the sense of security to survive.

A sense of security is a must, and a sense of security can only be obtained by relying on men. In ancient times, the basis for gaining a sense of security lies in a man's hunting ability and the amount of prey he catches, and this obviously requires a man to have a strong physique. So in ancient society, women would compete to find strong men. In other words, the standard for ancient women to choose a mate was mostly strength! As society has developed to this day, physical strength alone is no longer enough to represent the ability to hunt. "Hunting" needs to be supported by more complex factors. In such a civilized society, it is often not necessarily the strong men who hunt more prey. In the economic society, prey is represented by money, so money becomes prey, and men's ability to hunt evolves into the ability to earn money. Therefore, the criteria for women to choose a mate has evolved into a man's ability to make money and how much money he makes. In fact, the fact that women nowadays choose men with money as their spouse does not mean that women's nature has degenerated with the development of social civilization. It is just that the standards have changed to adapt to social development.




After this analysis, it seems that there is nothing wrong with women's pursuit of a sense of security, and the harshness of their choices of men caused by the pursuit of a sense of security and the vulgar appearance formed by it can also be understood. In fact, this is not the case.

Although women's pursuit of so-called "sense of security" and their pursuit of strong or wealthy men is the result of their nature evolved over thousands of years, the key point is that women as a group, their pursuit of security and safe men, as well as the inferior nature of human nature revealed in the process of pursuit, often greatly destroy the benign and healthy operating order of this society. (This will be discussed in detail below)

In this section, we only analyze whether a woman's sense of security must, can only, and solely rely on men? Is it possible for women as a group to break away from their dependence on men and independently pursue a sense of security, thus completely breaking away from the shadow of men even in terms of psychological inertia?

I think my discussion below will gradually get into the groove and become interesting.

Chang has always been wondering about the "sense of security" that women pursue. Let us analyze whether it is impossible for women to achieve "sense of security" alone in this era?

The answer is no! If in primitive society, hunting for survival requires the hunter to be physically strong, and women happen to lack this endowment in their physiological structure, then we can fully understand and accept the fact that women rely on men for their sense of security. But as society has developed to this day and age, maintaining a person's survival and spiritual satisfaction has long gone beyond the single factor of "strength". Menstruation, pregnancy, and physical weakness are no longer bottlenecks that hinder women's survival and development. In fact, as long as women are hardworking and make efforts to improve their knowledge, behavior and social strategies, they can completely rely on their own strength to gain a sense of security for survival and development!

So, why do our women still rely on finding a "strong man" to establish their sense of security? This can probably only be explained by the woman's innate "laziness". Otherwise, I really can't find any plausible reason for the woman not to be self-reliant!

Some people may ask, there are still many obstacles in this society for women's employment and work, what do you want women to do?

Here, I would like to talk about the feminist independence thoughts and movements that began in the West in the 1920s and 1930s. It is true that the transformation of human society towards industrial civilization and information civilization has objectively created space for women to act on an equal footing with men. However, influenced by traditional psychology, it is men who, to a certain extent, set up various artificial obstacles to women's employment in order to express their vanity of supporting their families. The fundamental purpose of the feminist movement in the West is actually to strive to eliminate these artificial barriers to women in many aspects such as employment and social role-playing! As for the subsequent results of sexual liberation, it was actually not the purpose of the feminist movement at all, but as the feminist movement continued to deepen, it won women space to "act", thus enabling women to grasp the initiative of survival and development, which was a kind of liberation for women in life. Sexual liberation is only a derivative of the aims of the feminist movement. But after this incident was brought to China, it was interpreted distorted by Chinese women.

First, we found that for contemporary Chinese women, there are not many artificial obstacles to their employment and social activities. The traditional dogma that requires women to "obey the three obediences and four virtues" and submit to the control of the male world was completely broken at least during the Cultural Revolution. Mao advocated that Chinese women should "not love red dresses but love weapons" and "women can hold up half the sky". Even today, Chinese politics deliberately arranges quotas for women in the selection of officials. It can be seen that the reality of Chinese society not only does not hinder women's actions, but also gives them the green light. In order to encourage women to take positive actions, the society even deliberately retains and opens up employment space for women at all costs. However, we regretfully discovered that women do not appreciate this and seem to prefer to just sit back and enjoy the share of men's hard work.

Secondly, even though China, as an extension of an ancient society, still has some discrimination and obstacles in its treatment of women, this society also creates space for women to release their resentment in this regard and win fairness. However, our women still seem indifferent to this. They do not seem willing to really push these obstacles away, but prefer to keep these obstacles so that they can always use them as an excuse to evade the burden of responsibility, inaction and laziness!

Next, let's talk about the equal social rights of sharing "diversified finances" with men, which is what Chinese women have talked about most in recent years. Frankly speaking, I am not opposed to Western women's openness in hairstyling, because they are qualified! Considering the role that Western women play in social development as a group, and the fact that Western women hold important positions in various fields of society and bear the same responsibilities for social development as men, they can feel at ease sharing the right to develop freely with men. But I cannot tolerate the way Chinese women are treated! Because when we look at Chinese women, have they caught up with even one-tenth of Western women in terms of shouldering social responsibilities and obligations? No!

So on this issue, Chinese women have made some of the same mistakes as in China's reform and opening up, namely, absorbing the dregs and discarding the essence. It is clearly a movement advocating that women should equally assume social responsibilities and obligations, but when it comes to Chinese women, it becomes a basis for advocating that women simply enjoy themselves. However, when it comes to the main theme of this movement, which is to have the courage to take responsibility for society, strive for self-reliance, and take the initiative in survival and development, our women deliberately avoided it!

So we see many facts nowadays, that is, young women are proud of not knowing how to cook. When we discuss family life with a young woman, we will sadly see that the young woman is so proud when she talks about her ignorance of housework! This is definitely a distortion of the portrayal of women. When talking about social obligations and responsibilities, Chinese women always avoid them. However, when talking about social rights and personal enjoyment, women talk about it with great relish and put on an expression of infinite grief and indignation to blame the male world for being harsh to her. Alas!

In addition, judging from the above description of women’s animal instincts that lead to their instinctive indifference to “diversification”, it is also extremely pointless for women to blindly follow men’s behavioral characteristics and deliberately pursue equality and similarity with men in this regard! This only shows that the woman is bored and clueless!

Based on the analysis of sense of security, we can also study the concept of "love". Taking this opportunity, Chang wants to completely overturn the foolish and wrong idealized understanding of "love" that remains in the hearts of people in the world. (Note that what is subverted in the song is not love, but the concept of love)

Stephen Chow left a classic line in A Chinese Odyssey: "Does it take a reason to love someone?" The movie did not give the answer, but I can, because I know that "loving someone" certainly requires a reason, and more than one!

In a society in transition, we see countless men and women are quite confused about the issue of "love". In fact, the confusion lies in the fact that the real love between men and women is completely inconsistent with the messages about "love" that people receive through novels, movies, etc.! In the artistic "interpretation of love" that people obtain through various channels, it seems that love is a single element. All it takes is a man and a woman, and then "love" will surely come. There is no need for any conditions other than gender difference. It is pure, clean and inexplicable. This is absolutely not the case! The love in books records the ideals of mankind, but life itself is as bad as ever. True love - if we must call the attraction between men and women "love", then it is also a complex and multi-elementary thing that carries too much vulgarity.

Love has its fixed yet diverse constituent elements. Among them, envy or mental pleasure is the starting point of its generation, while a sense of security is the backbone element and foundation of "love". Security is to the structure of love like water is to the human body, accounting for more than 70% of love. Generally speaking, after the above two elements are present between opposite sexes, and then supplemented by the product of time and space, a vivid "love" will be born!

After clearly analyzing the constituent elements of "love", it will be easy for us to understand many sad or happy phenomena that occur between men and women in the world. Furthermore, when we once again face the various faces that women use to treat us because of the so-called "love", we will have more understanding in our hearts and more motivation to fight for life!

Now many people hate Qiong Yao and criticize her excessive interpretation of love. However, one thing is certain: no matter how sad Grandma Joan was, she never misinterpreted the composition of love. Look at the male protagonists in her novels, is there any one of them who lacks the necessary elements of love that I described above? No. This rule applies to all the plays about talented men and beautiful women that have been produced in ancient China. Only young men, wealthy men, or geniuses in certain areas have the chance to enjoy the so-called Cupid's sword thrown by women. However, compared to ordinary men in reality, this thing is actually out of reach!

At this point, many people will raise questions. According to this theory, how can we explain the majority of poor couples in life who are stuck together in poverty and helplessness? Haha, this phenomenon is caused by this factor. That is, the sense of security that women pursue can be now or in the future. When a woman fails to find a sense of security now, she often settles for the second best and looks for a partner among men who do not have the ability to give her a sense of security now, but who she bets will be able to do so in the future. Although it is an unfortunate fact that most women lose the bet, the driving factor that drives her to depend on the man still cannot deny the core role of security in the combination of the two!

In this way, we can even conclude that there are three types of women in the world: one is a small group of women who have gained love and a sense of security, the other two are women who have not gained love and a sense of security, one of them is women who lost the gamble and failed to gain a sense of security, and the other is some women who, because they have been searching for a sense of security but have failed, simply give up the pursuit of a sense of security and just find a man to make do with.

Li Wen has a song in which she sings that love is really a big spell, so magical. It describes the pleasure a woman feels when the great joy of love hits her heart, and how the reason for the love is destroyed by that pleasure, as if love is completely accidental, without reason, and incredibly magical! In fact, how can love be magical? If it is a miracle, then why does such a miracle rarely or never happen to a migrant worker and a beautiful city woman?

If we carefully explore the trajectory of the woman's pursuit of "love", we will find that the emergence of love is not an accidental whim, but is clearly an organized and premeditated vulgar reaction of the woman!

In this way, many women who oppose Chang Mou's view can understand why Chang Mou, despite his good looks, was not appreciated by women because of his poverty. This is because those women believed that Chang Mou could not give her a sense of security, not only not at that time, but probably not in the future. Even if some women believe that singing can give them a sense of security in the future, when they meet a man who can give them a sense of security at that time, they will still leave me without hesitation. After all, between "the sense of security in the present" and "the sense of security in the unpredictable future", women will rationally and secularly choose the former.